AI Health Monitor.

We help you get full control of your tech and AI systems.

This is for you if...

Your AI is running. You have no idea if it is doing its job.

You found out your AI was producing wrong answers when a customer complained.

Your dashboard shows green. But green only means running.

You have logs. Logs only tell you what happened.

Your AI has been live for months and you have never actually measured its output quality.

What you get from a monitoring engagement.

AI workflow audit

Every AI workflow you are running, what it touches, and what it is supposed to produce.

WorkflowRunsValidationStatus
Dynamic pricing
247/d
Output range
pass
Invoice parser
43/d
Schema match
warn
Channel sync
892/d
Threshold check
pass
Guest comms agent
1.2k/d
Sentiment check
fail

We assign a defined expected output to each workflow, so that it can be measured over time. Workflows nobody owns, or remembers switching on, turn up here too.

Live monitoring and alerts

Continuous measurement of what your tech and AI is producing, with alerts when the output falls outside the thresholds you set.

0.0%
Uptimelast 30 days
Output quality0%
avg confidence, last 24 reads
2m agoLast rundynamic pricing
0.3%Error ratebelow threshold
14:02ai.output.validated
14:03ai.confidence.low → alert

We set up tracking across your tech stack, AI models included. When a key metric drifts or something fails, the right person gets an alert and can act straight away.

Plain-language audit trail

A record of what the AI read and what it did with it, written in sentences instead of log lines.

What happened overnight?
03:07:02 rate.set u118 conf=0.93 ok03:07:02 rate.set u119 conf=0.62 WARN03:07:03 rate.hold u119 prev=18903:07:03 alert.sent ops_oncall03:07:04 rate.set u120 conf=0.91 ok... 242 more
Morning note

247 rates set overnight. One looked wrong.

The model wasn't sure about unit 119, so it kept yesterday's price and told Ops at 03:07.

You need to understand what happens in your tech. We help you build audit trails that someone in operations or compliance can follow without asking an engineer to interpret them.

Response runbook

What to do in the first hour after an alert fires.

Ifconfidence.score < 0.7
01Check data source for drift
02Review last 10 outputs manually
03Escalate if > 5% affected
Ifschema.mismatch detected
01Check upstream data changes
02Update schema definition
03Re-run validation suite

We write this with you, for your business, to help you react to any failure type. This includes e.g. how to confirm it is real, how to stop it, and who needs to be alerted.

Case study.

Thirty customers churned but nobody saw it happen

Hospitality AI company

-60%debug time after the relaunch

A company building AI marketing agents for hospitality operators launched without monitoring, so nobody could see whether the agents were helping users post content, grow engagement or win direct bookings. All 30 early customers churned silently before anyone understood why. We defined a product analytics framework with clear metric definitions for every agent and specified lightweight PostHog-based monitoring. The second launch kept customers.

What changed

  • Failure modes surfaced across 20+ agents
  • User outcome achievement improved by 22%
  • Metric definitions owned per agent

How we help you.

Start with a free call. From there we either run a full value iteration on your stack and hand you the plan, or we stay on as your fractional CTO for data and AI.

  • Checkpoint

    Free, 30 minutes

    Bring one thing that's stuck. We tell you what's wrong with it and what to do first.

    Book a checkpoint
  • Value Iteration

    Scoped engagement, one-off

    We analyse your whole stack and build a pragmatic plan: what's broken, what to fix first, and who should own it. Your team or any vendor you hire can run it.

  • In the Loop

    Ongoing, fractional

    We work with you a few hours a week on what moves the strategy: prioritisation, vendor calls, architecture decisions and hiring.

Questions we get asked.

Output quality: whether the AI is doing what it is supposed to do on real inputs. This includes accuracy drift, unusual output patterns, and failure rates by input type. Traditional uptime monitoring tells you the service is running and catches none of that.

With a monitoring layer, you get alerts when outputs fall outside defined quality thresholds, before a customer sees a wrong answer. Without it, you find out from a complaint or a reconciliation that something has been wrong for weeks.

Seems to work is hard to defend. AI models degrade gradually as input data shifts and edge cases accumulate. The failures are often invisible until they are expensive. Monitoring replaces the feeling that things are probably fine with evidence.

Logging records that something happened. Monitoring tells you whether what happened was correct. Logs are for debugging after the fact. Monitoring catches problems before they reach customers.

For a defined AI workflow with clear expected outputs, 2 to 3 weeks for initial setup: defining quality thresholds, building the evaluation layer, connecting alerts. From there it runs continuously with minimal maintenance.

Let's get started.